Jing-Ying Wong, Abdul Kadir Marsono, Chun-Chieh Yip


The paper describes the approach to develop the 1/5 scaled physical model and its applicability is validated against full scale model. Non-dimensional modelling methods using Buckingham Pi Theorem and Similitude Theory are explained and material properties for concrete, reinforcement, steel links, and beam-column connections are provided. The comparison between the results of experimental flexural test and Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis (NLFEA) of 1/5 scaled model and prototype of prefabricated IBS are discussed and presented. This paper is to verify the procedures and results of flexural test for 1/5 scaled model of prefabricated IBS in comparison to the prototype. The IBS components were set-up and tested under two-points monotonic vertical loading in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Structure Laboratory. Three Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs) and two strain gauges were instrumented in the small-scaled model to record deflections and strains. Both small-scaled model and prototype were analysed by Abaqus FEA software. Elastic range for both small scaled model and prototype are determined by scaled factor of 5.0, and proven to be accurate by both experimental test and NLFEA with ultimate capacity of 13 kN load and 10.9 mm vertical deflection. Since the similitude theory only applicable until elastic limit, hence the structural performance in nonlinear state is evaluated in concrete crack patterns and beam-column connection deformations are presented graphically in this paper. Load-displacement with maximum 12.9 mm deflection, 35.64 N/mm2 ultimate crushing stresses at concrete and beam-column connection with minimum yield strength of 222.6 N/mm2 are presented. This paper concluded that the procedures and results of flexural test for 1/5 scaled model of prefabricated IBS is valid in comparison to the prototype. 


SMART IBS, scaled models, flexural test, experimental, numerical validation

Full Text:



Yip, C. C., Marsono, A. K., Wong, J. Y., Amran, M. Y. H. 2015. Flexural Strength Of Special Reinforced Lightweight Concrete Beam For Industrialised Building System (IBS). Jurnal Teknologi. 77(1): 187-196.

Yang, K. H., Oh, M. H., Kim, M. H., Lee, H. C. 2010. Flexural Behaviour of Hybrid Precast Concrete Beams with H-Steel Beams at Both Ends. Engineering Structure. 32: 2940-2949.

Akiyama, M., Abe, S., Aoki, N., Suzuki, M. 2012. Flexural Test of Precast High-Strength Reinforced Concrete Pile Prestressed With Unbonded Bars Arranged at The Center of The Cross-Section. Engineering Structure. 34: 259-270.

Tesser, L., Scotta, R. 2013. Flexural and Shear Capacity of Composite Steel Truss and Concrete Beams with Inferior Precast Concrete Base. Engineering Structure. 49: 135-145.

Kulkarni, S. A., Li, B., Yip, W. K. 2008. Finite Element Analysis of Precast Hybrid-Steel Concrete Connections Under Cyclic Loading. Journal of Construction Steel Research. 64(2): 190-201.

Yip, C. C., Marsono, A. K., 2016. Structural Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Block System for Two Storeys Safe House. Jurnal Teknologi. 78(2): 83-97.

Marsono, A. K., Wong, J. Y., Masine, M. T., Yip, C. C., Amir, H. 2015. Standard Verification Test for Industrialised Building System (IBS) Repetitive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 26: 252-257.

Schlickman, J. 2003. MS ISO 9001:2000. Quality Management System Design. Artech House, Norwood, USA.

Datin, P. L., Prevatt, D. O. 2013. Using Instrumented Small-Scale Models to Study Structural Load Paths in Wood-Framed Buildings. Engineering Structure. 54: 47-56.

Kim, N. S., Lee, J. H., Chang, S. P. 2009. Equivalent Multi-Phase Similitude Law for Pseudodynamic Test On Small Scale Reinforced Concrete Models. Engineering Structure. 31: 834-846.

Satish, K., Itoh, Y., Saizuka, K., and Usami, T. 1997. Pseudo Dynamic Testing Of Scaled Models. Journal of Structural Engineering. 123 (4): 524-526.

Laefer, D. F., Hong, L. T., Erkal, A., Long, J. H., Cording, E. J. 2011. Manufacturing, Assembly, and Testing Of Scaled, Historic Masonry for One-Gravity, Pseudo-Static, Soil-structure Experiments. Construction and Build Mater. 25: 4362-73.

Buckingham, E. 1914. On Physically Similar Systems; Illustrations of The Use Of Dimensional Equations. Physic Research. IV(4): 345-76.

Van, S. R. C. 1968. Small Scale Reinforced Concrete Models. Joint Highway Research Project. 15(1): 1-146.

Harris, H. G., Sabnis, G. M. 1999. Structural Modelling and Experimental Techniques. CRC Press. 2: 1-808.

Building Assembly System. 2011. International Patent No: W00201103123 PCT/MY/2011/000182. Dr. A. K. Marsono, Dr. Ahmad Mahir Makhtar, Dr. Masine Md. Tap.

BS 8110. 1997. Structural Use of Concrete Part 1: Code of Practice for Design and Construction. British Standard Institution. London. 1: 1-128.

Eurocode 2. 2003. Design of Concrete Structures Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. Comité Européen de normalisation, Brussels, Belgium. 1: 1-226.

Ramu, M., Prabhu, R.V., Thyla, P.R. 2013. Establishment of Structural Similitude for Elastic Models and Validation of Scaling Laws. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 17(1): 139-144.

ASTM C496. 2004. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. West Conshohocken (PA, USA): ASTM International. 1: 1-5

EN 12390-5. 2009. Testing Hardened Concrete, Shape, Dimensions and Other Requirements for Specimens and Moulds. Comité Européen de normalisation, Brussels, Belgium. 1: 1-10.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.10478


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2012 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.