NUMERICAL MODELING OF PHASE TRANSFORMATION DURING GRINDING PROCESS

Syed Mushtaq Ahmed Shah, M. A. Khattak, Muhammad Asad, Javed Iqbal, Saeed Badshah, M. S. Khan

Abstract


The rapid heating and cooling in a grinding process may cause phase transformations. This will introduce thermal strains and plastic strains simultaneously in a workpiece with substantial residual stresses. The properties of the workpiece material will change when phase transformation occurs. The extent of such change depends on the temperature history experienced and the instantaneous thermal stresses developed. To carry out a reliable residual stress analysis, a comprehensive modelling technique and a sophisticated computational procedure that can accommodate the property change with the metallurgical change of material need to be developed. The objective of this work is to propose a simplified model to predict phase evolution during given temperature history for heating and cooling as encountered during grinding process. The numerical implementation of the proposed model is carried out through the developed FORTRAN subroutine called PHASE using the FEM commercial software Abaqus®/standard. Micro-structural constituents are defined as state variables. They are computed and updated inside the subroutine PHASE. The heating temperature is assumed to be uniform while the cooling characteristics in relation to phase transformations are obtained from the continuous cooling transformation (CCT) diagram of the given material (here AISI 52100 steel). Four metallurgical phases are assumed for the simulations: austenite, pearlite, bainite, and martensite. It was shown that at low cooling rates high percentage of pearlite phase is obtained when the material is heated and cooled to ambient temperature. Bainite is formed usually at medium cooling rates. Similarly at high cooling rates maximum content of martensite may be observed. It is also shown that the continuous cooling transformation kinetics may be described by plotting the transformation temperature, directly against the cooling rate as an alternative to the continuous cooling transformation diagram. The simulated results are also compared with experimental results of Wever [20] and Hunkle [21] and are found to be in a very good agreement. The model may be used for further thermo-mechanical analysis coupled with phase transformation during grinding process.


Keywords


Grinding process, AISI 52100 steel, Phase transformation, numerical modelling, continuous cooling transformation diagram

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shah S. M. A., D. Nelais, M. Zain, M. Coret. 2012. Numerical Simulation of Grinding Induced Phase Transformation and Residual Stresses in AISI-52100 Steel. International Journal of Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 61: 1-11.

Schulze, V., Uhlmann, E., Mahnken, R., Menzel, A., Biermann, D., Zabel, A., & Bartel, T. 2015. Evaluation of Different Approaches for Modeling Phase Transformations in Machining Simulation. Production Engineering. 9(4): 437-449.

Johnson, W. A., & Mehl, R. F. 1939. Reaction Kinetics in Processes of Nucleation and Growth. Trans. Aime. 135(8): 396-415.

Avrami, M. 1939. Kinetics of Phase Change. I General Theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 7(12): 1103-1112.

Avrami, M. 1940. Kinetics of Phase Change. II Transformation‐time Relations for Random Distribution of Nuclei. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 8(2): 212-224.

Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. 2001. Bainite in Steels. The Inst. of Meter. 2nd Ed. Institute of Materials.

Webster, G. A., and Ezeilo, A. N. 2001. Residual Stress Distributions and Their Influence on Fatigue Lifetimes. International Journal of Fatigue. 23(1): 375-383.

Inoue, T. and Raniecki, B. 1978. Determination of Thermal-hardening Stress in Steels by Use of Thermoplasticity Theory. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 26(3): 187-212.

Habraken, A. M. and Bourdouxhe, M. 1992. Coupled Thermo-mechanical-metallurgical Analysis During the Cooling Process of Steel Pieces. European Journal of Mechanics. A. Solids. 11(3): 381-402.

Sjöström, S. 1985. Interactions and Constitutive Models for Calculating Quench Stresses in Steel. Materials Science and Technology. 1(10): 823-829.

Fernandes, F. M. B., Denis, S. and Simon, A. 1985. Mathematical Model Coupling Phase Transformation and Temperature Evolution During Quenching of Steels. Materials Science and Technology. 1(10): 838-844.

Koistinen, D. P. and Marburger, R. E. 1959. A General Equation Prescribing the Extent of the Austenite-Martensite Transformation in Pure Iron-carbon Alloys and Plain Carbon Steels. Acta Metallurgica. 7(1): 59-60.

Leblond, J. B. and Devaux, J. 1984. A New Kinetic Model for Anisothermal Metallurgical Transformations in Steels Including Effect of Austenite Grain Size. Acta Metallurgica. 32(1): 137-146.

Leblond, J. B., Mottet, G., Devaux, J. and Devaux, J. C. 1985. Mathematical Models of Anisothermal Phase Transformations in Steels, and Predicted Plastic Behaviour. Materials Science and Technology. 1(10): 815-822.

Waeckel, F., Dupas, P. and Andrieux, S. 1996. A Thermo-Metallurgical Model for Steel Cooling Behaviour: Proposition, Validation and Comparison with the Sysweld's Model. Le Journal de Physique IV. 6(C1): C1-255.

Wrożyna, A., Pernach, M., Kuziak, R. et al. 2016. Experimental and Numerical Simulations of Phase Transformations Occurring During Continuous Annealing of Dp Steel Strips. Journal of Material Engineering and Performance. 25: 1481.

Christian, J. W. 2002. The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys. PERGAMON. An Imprint of Elsevier Science.

Scheil, E. 1935. Start-up Time of Austenitic Conversion. Archive for the Ironworks. 12: 564-567.

Owaku, S., and Akasu, H. 1963. Time-Temperature-Austenitization Diagram of Hypereutectoid Steel. Transactions of the Japan Institute of Metals. 4(3): 173-178.

Wever, F. A. Rose, W. Peter, W. Strassburg and L. Rademacher. 1959. Atlas for the Heat Treatment of Steels. Verlag Stahleisen, GmbH, Germany.

Hunkel, M., Lübben, T., Hoffmann, F. and Mayr, P. 2004. Using the Jominy End-quench Test for Validation of Thermo-metallurgical Model Parameters. Journal de Physique IV. 120: 571-579.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.10573

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2012 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.