The Use of Digital Stories for Listening Comprehension among Primary Chinese Medium School Pupils: Some Preliminary Findings

Shanti C. Sandaran, Lim Chia Kia

Abstract


This article reports on preliminary findings based on observations and comprehension exercises during an on-going study on the use of digital stories for listening comprehension among Primary Year 3 students in a C­hinese medium school. The preliminary findings would inform the main study that looks at the effectiveness of digital stories for listening comprehension. 30 primary Year 3 students (aged 9) were involved in the listening/viewing of 8 animations of fairy tales over a period of 8 weeks. The findings based on the observations revealed that the students displayed high levels of interest, attention and motivation. The students also showed interest in fairy tales. The results from the comprehension exercises showed some level of improvement in their comprehension of the stories. Finally, it was also noted that pre-teaching vocabulary is essential to ensure the success of digital stories in improving students’ listening comprehension. The findings indicate the potential of digital stories in increasing the level of motivation, interest, and attention in ESL/EFL learning.


Keywords


ICT; digital story; listening comprehension; ESL

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Shehri, S. and Gitsaki, C. 2010 Online reading: A Preliminary Study of the Impact of Integrated and Split-Attention Formats on L2 Students’ Cognitive Load. ReCALL. 22(3): 356–375.

Amaral, L. A. and Meurers, D., 2011. On Using Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language and Split-Attention Formats On L2 Students’ Cognitive Load. ReCALL. 22(3): 356–375.

Bagg, M.B. 1991. Folk Literature in the Foreign Language Classroom. Retrivedfromhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED343432, accessed April 18, 2012.

Barrett, H. 2006. Researching and Evaluating Digital Storytelling as a Deep Learning Tool. In C. Crawford, Combs, A., & Beach, D. 1994. Stories and storytelling: Personalizing the social studies. The Reading Conference. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. 647–654.

Bettelheim, B. 2010. The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Chung, J. 1999. The Effects of Using Video Texts Supported with Advance Organizers and Captions on Chinese College Student’s Listening Comprehension: An Empirical Study. Foreign Language Annals. 32(3): 295–309.

Chandran, S. 2003. Where are the ELT Textbooks? In Renandya, W.A. (Ed.) Methodology and Materials Design in Language Teaching: Current Perceptions and Practices and their Implications. Anthology Series 44 Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre Publishers. 161–169.

Collie, J & Slater, S. 1987. Literature in the Language Classroom. A Resource Book of Ideas and Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dickinson, D.K. 2001. Putting the Pieces Together: Impact of Preschool on Children’s Language and Literacy Development in Kindergarten. In D.K. Dickinson & P.O. Tabors (Eds.). Beginning Literacy with Language: Young Children Leanring at Home and School. Baltimore, MD: Paul H.Brookes. 257–287.

Digital Storytelling Association 2002. The Center for Digital Storytelling. Accessed 20 Oct 2013. Retrieved from http://www.dsaweb.org.

Dogan, B. 2009. Educational Uses of Digital Storytelling: The Challenges of Designing an Online Digital Storytelling Contest for K-12 Students and Teachers. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.). Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. 3879–3884.

Enclycopaedia Britannica 2008. www.britannica.com.

Field, J. 2002. The Changing Face of Listening. Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 242–247.

Glazer, S. M. & Burke, E. M. 1994. An Integrated Approach to Early Literacy: Literature to Language. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Goh, C. and Taib, Y. 2006 Metacognitive Instruction in Listening for Young Learners. ELT Journal. 60(3): 222–232.

Graham, S. 2006. Listening Comprehension: The Learner’s Perspective. System. 34(2): 165–182.

Hedge, T. 2006. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hofer, M., & Swan, K.O. 2006. Standards, Firewalls and General Classroom Mayhem: Implementing Student Centered Research Projects in a Social Studies Classroom. Social Studies Research and Practice, 1(1). Retrievedfromhttp://www.socstrp.org/issues/viewarticle.cfm?volID=1&IssueID=1&ArticleID=3.

Jacobsen, M. 2001. Building Different Bridges: Technology Integration, Engaged Student Learning, and New Approaches to Professional Development. Paper presented at AERA 2001: What We Know and How We Know It, the 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, April 10–14.

Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. 2002. Case-Based Reasoning and Instructional Design. Using Stories Journal. 60(3): 222–232.

Krashen, S. 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Application. London: London.

Mayer, R. E. 2001. Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Meinardi, M. 2009. Speed Bumps for Authentic Listening Material. ReCALL, 21(3): 302–318.

Mello, R. 2001. The Power of Storytelling: How Oral Narrative Influences Children's Relationships in Classrooms. International Journal of Education & the Arts. 2(1).

Perry, B. 2000. The Meaning of Words. Retrieved 22 October 2013. http:teacher.scholastic.com.

Pinter, A. 2006. Teaching Young Language Learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ramirez, D. & Alonso, I. 2007. Using Digital Stories to Improve Listening Comprehension with Spanish Young Learners of English. Language Learning & Technology. 11(1): 87–101.

Sadik, A. 2008. Digital Storytelling: A Meaningful Technology-Integrated Approach for Engaged Student Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development. 56(4): 487–506.

Salaberry, M.R. 2001. The use of technology for Second Language Learning and Teaching: A Retrospective. The Modern Language Journal. 85(1): 39–56.

Sandaran, S.C. & Mohan Das, M. 2013. The Importance of Vocabulary Development for English Language Teaching and Learning: The Malaysian ESL Context. In Press.

Schiro, M. 2004. Oral Storytelling and Teaching Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M. 1990. Accomplished Teachers: Integrating Computers into Classroom Practice. New York: Center for Technology in Education.

Tsou, W., Wang, W., & Tzeng, Y. 2006. Applying a Multimedia Storytelling Website in Foreign Language Learning. Computers & Education. 47(1): 17–28.

Vandergrift, L. 2011. Second Language Listening: Presage, Process, Product and Pedagogy. In Hinkel, E. (ed.) Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge. 455–471.

Verhoeven, L. & Snow, C. E. 2008. Literacy and Motivation. Reading Engagement in Individuals and Groups. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.

Whitehurst, G. J. & Lonigan, C. J. 1998. Child Development And Emergent Literacy. Child Development. 69: 848–872.

Wipf, J. 1984. Strategies for Teaching Second Language Listening Comprehension. Foreign Language Annals. 17(4): 345–348.

Wright, A. 1997. Creating Stories with Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zeverbergenn, A. A. & Whitehurst, G. J. 2003. Dialogic Reading: A Shared Picture Book Reading Intervention for Preschoolers. In A. van Kleek, S. A Stahl & E.B.Bauer (eds.) On Reading books to children: Parents and Teachers. Mahwah, JJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.177–200.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2358

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2012 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.