Constructing an Adoption Model for e-Government Services

Maziar Shajari, Zuraini Ismail

Abstract


 

The frequent use of e-Government services and the ability of the government to successfully implement e-Government to match the needs of the citizens remain to be understood. The purpose of this study is to construct an adoption model for the e-Government services by considering renowned technology adoption models. This model considered trustworthiness in shaping the adoption model. To test the model, questionnaire was designed, adapted from previous studies which were distributed to employees of public organizations in Esfahan, Iran. The proposed model was thoroughly analyzed using Structured Equation Modeling (SEM). The new adoption model modified and the final model consist of ten constructs including intention to use, trustworthiness, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, compatibility, social influence, job relevant, output quality, and image. The results affirmed that relationships between the model variables suggested good model fit. The fitted model of this study may be applied to other e-Government services of other countries.


Keywords


Adoption of e-Government services; information technology adoption; trustworthiness; intention to use; structured equation modeling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, M. O., Markkula, J. and Oivo, M. 2013. Factors Afecting E-Government Adoption in Pakistan: A Citizen’s Perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. 7(2): 225–239.

Hedman, J. and Gimpel, G. 2010. The Adoption of Hyped Hechnologies: A Qualitative Study. Information Technology and Management. 11(4): 161–175.

United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. New York. 2012.

Conrad, E. 2009. Willingness to Use IT Innovations: A Hybrid Approach Employing Diffusion of Innovations and Technology Acceptance Models. Ph.D. Thesis. Management. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Illinois, USA.

Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13: 319–330.

Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. 2000. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science. 45(2): 186–204.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly. 27(3): 425–478.

Rogers, E. M., 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

Davis, F. D., Baggozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. 1989. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: a Comparison of Two Theoritical Models. Management Science. 35(8): 982–1003.

Rogers, E. M., 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free press.

Shajari, M. and Ismail, Z. 2010. A Comprehensive Adoption Model of e-Government Services in Developing Countries, Presented at the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Management Science (ICAMS). Chengdu.

Cui, G., Bao, W. and Chan, T.-S. 2009. Consumers’ Adoption of New Technology Products: The Role of Coping Strategies. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 26(2): 110–120.

Carter, L. and Belanger, F. 2005. The Utilization of E-Government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors. Information Systems Journal. 15(1): 5–25.

Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. 2000. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science. 45(2): 186–204.

Datta, P. 2011. A Preliminary Study of E-Commerce Adoption in Developing Countries. Information Systems Journal. 21(1): 3–32.

Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K. and Williams, M. D. 2013. Evaluating Alternative Theoretical Models for Examining Citizen Centric Adoption of E-Government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. 7(1): 27–49.

Grabner-Krauter, S., Kaluscha, E. A. and Fladnitzer, M. 2006. Perspectives of Online Trust and Similar Constructs: A Conceptual Clarification, Presented at the 8th International Conference on Electronic Commerce: The New e-Commerce: Innovations for Conquering Current Barriers, Obstacles and Limitations to Conducting Successful Business on the Internet. Fredericton, Canada.

Pavlou, P. A. 2003. Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 7(3): 69–103.

Belanger, F., Hiller, J. and Smith, W. 2002. Trustworthiness in Electronic Commerce: The Role of Privacy, Security, and Site Attributes. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 11(3/4): 245–270.

Chee-Wee, T., Shan-Ling, P. and Lim, E. T. K. 2005. Towards the Restoration of Public Trust in Electronic Governments: A Case Study of the e-Filing System in Singapore., Presented at the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu, HI.

Salam, A. F., Iyer, L., Palvia, P. and Singh, R. 2005. Trust in e-Commerce. Communications of the ACM. 48(2): 72–77.

McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L. and Chervany, N. L. 1998. Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review 23(3): 473–490.

Lee, Y., Kozar, K. and Larsen, K. 2003. The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present & Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 12: 752–780.

Ozgen, F. B. and Turan, A. H. 2007. Usage and Adoption of Online Tax Filing and Payment System in Tax Management: An Empirical Assessment with Technology Acceptance (TAM) Model in Turkey, Presented at the 9th International Scientific Conference, Management Horizons: Visions and Challenges. Kaunas.

Horton, R., Buck, T., Waterson, P. and Clegg, C. 2001. Explaining Intranet Use with Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Information Technology. 16: 237–249.

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W. 2003. Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly. 27(1): 51-90.

Moore, G. and Benbasat, I. 1991. Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research. 2(3): 173–191.

Tassabehji, R. and Elliman, T. 2006. Generating Citizen Trust in e-Government Using a Trust Verification Agent: A Researcher Note, Presented at the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS). Costa Blanca, Alicante, Spain

Sang, S. and Lee, J. D. 2009. A Conceptual Model of e-Government Acceptance in Public Sector, Presented at the Third International Conference on Digital Society.

Cheng, D., Liu, G. and Qian, C. 2008. On Determinants of User Acceptance of Internet Banking: A Theoretical Framework and Empirical Study, Presented at the Advanced Management of Information for Globalized Enterprises (AMIGE 2008). Tianjin

Anderson, J. E., Schwager, P. H. and Kerns, R. L. 2006. The Drives for Acceptance of Tablet PCs by Faculty in a College of Business. Journal of Information Systems Education. 17(4): 429–440.

Tajudeen, S. A. and Liman, M. A. 2011. Structural Equation Modelling Analysis: Factor Influencing Technology Use in Nigeria Universities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business. 3(3): 1230–1243.

Park, J. K., Yang, S. J. and Lehto, X. R. 2007. Adoption of Mobile Tchnologies for Chinese Consumers. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 8(3): 196–206.

Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M. and Gutteling, J. M. 2007. Perceived Usefulness, Personal Experiences, Risk Perception and Trust as Determinants of Adoption of E-Government Services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior. 23(4): 1838–1852.

Spaulding, T. J. 2010. How Can Virtual Communities Create Value for Business? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,. 9(1): 38–49.

Šumak, B., Polančič, G. and Heričko, M. 2010. An Empirical Study Of Virtual Learning Environment Adoption Using UTAUT, Presented at the Second International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-line Learning. Saint Maarten.

Marchewka, J. T., Liu, C. and Kostiwa, K. 2007. An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software. Communications of the IIMA. 7: 93–104.

Guo, Y. and Barnes, S. 2007. Why People Buy Virtual Items in Virtual Worlds with Real Money. Database for Advances in Information Systems. 38(4): 69–76.

Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Coventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 6(1): 1–55.

Byrne, B. M., 2010. Structured Equation Modeling with AMOS, 2nd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.

Kline, R. B., 2011. Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Carter, L. 2008. E-Government Diffusion: A Comparison of Adoption Constructs. Transforming Government: People Process and Policy. 2(3): 147–161.

Gilbert, D. and Balestrini, P. 2004. Barriers and Benefits in the Adoption of e-Government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management. 17(4): 286–301.

Lean, O. K., Zailani, S., Ramayah, T. and Fernando, Y. 2009. Factors Influencing Intention to Use E-Government Services Among Citizens in Malaysia. International Journal of Information Management. 29: 458–475.

Tolbert, C. J. and Mossberger, K. 2006. The Effects of e-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government. Public Administration Review. 66(3): 354–369.

Srivastava, S. C. and Thompson, S. H. 2005. Citizen Trust Development for e-Government Adoption: Case of Singapore, Presented at the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson, P. E., 2009. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Prentice Hall.

Teo, T. 2010. A Case for Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) in Educational Technology Research. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41: E89–E91.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v68.2906

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2012 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.