Usability Elements as Benchmarking Criteria for Enterprise Architecture Methodologies

Amir Bijarchian, Rosmah Ali

Abstract


An Enterprise Architecture (EA) serves as a blueprint to deal with the complexity within an organisation. Information Technology architects implement EA by utilizing the EA methodologies and frameworks. Although there are many methodologies and frameworks in enterprise architecture, each of them does not completely address all enterprise issues. The qualitative characteristics of the EA methodologies should be evaluated before implementing the EA in the organization, otherwise the organization might fail to achieve the organizational goals, cause confusion in the business process, and waste a lot of resources. One of the qualitative characteristics is usability, which should be evaluated in EA frameworks as an essential element of the whole system. The purpose of this study is to detail out the usability elements in EA methodologies.

Keywords


Enterprise architecture; usability; methodology; benchmarking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bijarchian, A., and Ali, R. 2013. A Model to Assess the Usability of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks. Paper presented at the 2013 International Conference on Informatics and Creative Multimedia (ICICM). 33–37.

Engel, A., and Browning, T. R. 2008. Designing Systems for Adaptability by Means of Architecture Options. Systems Engineering. 11: 125–146.

Group, D. O. D. A. F. W. 2007. DoD Architecture Framework: version 1.5. Technical report, Department of Defense, USA. Document Number.

Khayami, R. 2011. Qualitative Characteristics of Enterprise Architecture. Procedia Computer Science. 3: 1277–1282.

Lankhorst, M. 2004. the ArchiMate team. ArchiMate Language Primer.

Lim, N., Lee, T., and Park, S. 2009. A Comparative Analysis of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Based on EA Quality Attributes. 10th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2009. SNPD'09. 283–288

Magoulas, T., Hadzic, A., Saarikko, T., and Pessi, K. 2012. Alignment in Enterprise Architecture: A Comparative Analysis of Four Architectural Approaches. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation. 15(1)

Mayer, J. 2011. How Service Orientation Can Improve the Flexibility of Executive Information Systems—An Architecture Reworked from a Business Perspective. Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. 306–320.

Minoli, D. 2008. Enterprise Architecture A to Z: Frameworks, Business Process Modeling, SOA, and Infrastructure Technology. Auerbach Publications.

Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. B., and Padda, H. K. 2006. Usability Measurement and Metrics: A Consolidated Model. Software Quality Journal. 14: 159–178.

Sessions, R. 2012. The Snowman Architecture Part Three: The Technical Benefits. System Architecture for Complex Enterprise. 2012 (23 December).

Smirnov, S., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., and Weske, M. 2009. Action Patterns in Business Process Models. Springer.

The Open Group, The Open Group Architectural Framework (ver 8.1 Enterprise Edition) 2009. Available: http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/.

Thi, T. T. P., and Helfert, M. 2009. An Information System Quality Framework Based on Information System Architectures.

Uwohali. 1996. Operability in Systems Concept and Design: Survey, Assessment, and Implementation Final Report.

Velitchkov, I. 2009. Enterprise Architecture Metrics in the Balanced Scorecard for IT ISACA. 3: 6.

Zachman, J. A. 1987. A Framework for Information System Architecture. IBM Systems Journal. 26: 276–292.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v68.2908

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2012 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.