EMG RECORDING OF WRIST GESTURES UNDER NON-IDEAL ELECTRODE PLACEMENT FOR MACHINE CONTROL IN A MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT

Zinvi Fu, A. Y. Bani Hashim, Z. Jamaludin, I. S. Mohamad

Abstract


The use of electromyography (EMG) for machine control in a manufacturing environment is challenging due to the inherent electrical noise, and also because machine operators lack anatomy knowledge of muscle location for electrode placement. In this research, an electrode placement scheme is proposed for this user group. An EMG preamp was constructed to observe EMG patterns in lower forearm when electrodes placed by untrained operators are in less optimal locations. Crosstalk was found to be a major issue when electrodes are placed in imperfect locations. The EMG preamplifier was deliberately constructed with low cost components to simulate the increased floor noise due to electrical interferences f however from the results, the resulting SNR is acceptable. This study shows that in designing a practical EMG input system, electrode placement is a bigger factor compared to electrical interference.


Keywords


Electromyography, EMG Human Machine Interface, Synthetic System, lower forearm muscles, biosignal data acquisition, manufacturing environment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berzuini, C., Maranzana-Figini, M., and Bernardinelli, L. 1982. “Effective use of EMG parameters in the assessment of neuromuscular diseases,” Int. J. Biomed. Comput., 13(6): 481–499

Pease, W. S., Lew, H. L., and Johnson, E. W. 2007 .Johnson’s Practical Electromyography., 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,

Cannan J.,and Hu, H. 2013. “Automatic user identification by using forearm biometrics,” in 2013 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. 710–715.

Jamaluddin, F. N., Ahmad, S. A., Noor, S. B. M., and Hassan, W. Z. W. 2014. “Future direction of the electromyography based method to evaluate muscle fatigue,” in 2014 4th International Conference on Engineering Technology and Technopreneuship (ICE2T). 314–319.

Artemiadis, P. 2012. “EMG-based Robot Control Interfaces: Past, Present and Future,” in Advances in Robotics & Automation. 01(02): 10–12.

Zhou, Z. 2010. Manufacturing Intelligence for Industrial Engineering: Methods for System Self-Organization, Learning, and Adaptation: Methods for System Self-Organization, Learning, and Adaptation. IGI Global

Oborski, P. “2004. Man-machine interactions in advanced manufacturing systems,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 23(3–4): 227–232

Hashim, A. Y. B., Maslan, M. N., Izamshah, R. and Mohamad, I. S. 2014. “Delivering key signals to the machine: seeking the electric signal that muscles emanate,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 546: 012020,

Hashim, A. Y. B., Fu, Z., Jamaludin, Z., and Mohamad, I. S. 2015. “How electromyography readings from the human forearm are made cryptic , trivial , or non-trivial information for use in synthetic systems,” in Proceedings of 2015 5th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology

Bitzer, S., Hardware, A. E. M. G., and Van Der Smagt, P. 2006. “Learning EMG control of a robotic hand: Towards Active Prostheses,” in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. May: 2819–2823.

Shenoy, P., Miller, K. J., Crawford, B. and Rao, R. N. 2008.“Online electromyographic control of a robotic prosthesis.,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55(3): 1128–35

Northrop, R. 2001. Noninvasive Instrumentation and Measurement in Medical Diagnosis. CRC Press

Artemiadis P., and Kyriakopoulos, K. 2010. “EMG-based control of a robot arm using low-dimensional embeddings,” Robot. IEEE Trans. 393–398,

Itou, T. and Terao, M. 2001. “Mouse cursor control system using EMG,” 23rd Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 1368–1369

Castellini, C., Van Der Smagt, P., Sandini, G., and Hirzinger, G. 2008. “Surface EMG for force control of mechanical hands,” 2008 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. 725–730

Leijnse, J. N. A. L. 2008.Campbell-Kyureghyan, N. H., Spektor, D., and Quesada, P. M. “Assessment of individual finger muscle activity in the extensor digitorum communis by surface EMG.,” J. Neurophysiol. 100(6): 3225–35.

Vogel, J., Bayer, J., and Van Der Smagt, P. 2013. “Continuous robot control using surface electromyography of atrophic muscles,” 2013 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. 845–850

Stoica, A., Assad, C., Wolf, M., You, K. S., Pavone, M., Huntsberger, T., and Iwashita, Y. 2012. “Using arm and hand gestures to command robots during stealth operations,” in Multisensor, Multisource Information Fusion: Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications 2012

Tortora, G. J., and Derrickson, B. 2009. Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, 12th ed. John Wiley & Sons,

Wang, J., and Bronlund, J. E. 2013. “Surface EMG Signal Amplification and Filtering,” Int. J. Comput. Appl. (0975 – 8887), vol. 82, no. November. 15–22

Muhammad Zahak Jamal. 2012. “Signal Acquisition Using Surface EMG and Circuit Design Considerations For Robotic Prosthesis,” in Computational Intelligence in Electromyography Analysis - A Perspective on Current Applications and Future Challenges, InTech. 427–448.

Shobaki, M. M., Malik, N. A., Khan, S., Nurashikin, A., Haider, S., Larbani, S., Arshad, A., and Tasnim, R. 2013. “High Quality Acquisition of Surface Electromyography – Conditioning Circuit Design,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 53: 012027

Guerreiro, T., Jorge, J., Jo, T., Armando, J., and Jorge, P. 2006. “Emg as a daily wearable interface,” in GRAPP 2006: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications

De Luca, C. J. 2002. “Surface Electromyography: Detection and Recording,” DelSys Inc. 10(2): 1–10,

Moore K. L., and Dalley, A. F. 1999. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6606

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2012 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.