EVENT-BASED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING USING ADAPTIVE NETWORK-BASED FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM

Nadeem Nawaz, Sobri Harun, Amin Talei, Tak Kwin Chang

Abstract


Population growth and transformation of agricultural or forest landscapes to built-up areas are the common phenomenon in the fast developing countries. Such changes have significant impact on hydrologic processes in the catchment which in turn may end up with an increase in both magnitude and frequency of floods in urban areas. Therefore, reliable rainfall-runoff models that are able to estimate discharge of a catchment accurately are in need. To date, several physically-based models are developed to capture the rainfall-runoff process; however, they require significant number of parameters which could be difficult to be measured or estimated. Beside these models, the artificial intelligence techniques have shown their ability to identify a direct mapping between inputs and outputs with less number of physical parameters. Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is one of the well-practiced techniques in hydrological time series modeling. The aim of this study was to check the capability of ANFIS in event-based rainfall runoff modeling for a tropical catchment. A total of 70 rainfall-runoff events were extracted from twelve years hourly rainfall and runoff data of Semenyih River catchment where 50 of them were chosen for training and the remaining 20 for testing. An input selection method based on correlation analysis and mutual information was developed to identify the proper input combinations of rainfall and discharge antecedents. The results obtained by ANFIS model were then compared with an autoregressive model with exogenous inputs (ARX) as a bench mark. Results showed that ANFIS outperforms ARX model and has capabilities to be used as a reliable rainfall-runoff modeling tool.


Keywords


Rainfall-Runoff modeling; Event-based modeling; Neuro-fuzzy systems; ANFIS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aqil, M. Kita, I. Yano, A. and Nishiyama, S. 2007. A Comparative Study Of Artificial Neural Networks And Neuro-Fuzzy In Continuous Modeling Of The Daily And Hourly Behaviour Of Runoff. Journal of Hydrology. 337(1–2): 22-34.

Jayawardena, A.W. Perera, E.D.P. Zhu, B. Amarasekara, J.D. and Vereivalu, V. 2014. A Comparative Study Of Fuzzy Logic Systems Approach For River Discharge Prediction. Journal of Hydrology. 514(0): 85-101.

Babovic, V. and Keijzer, M. 2005. Rainfall‐Runoff Modeling Based on Genetic Programming. Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences.

Halff, A.H. Halff, H.M. and Azmoodeh, M. 1993. Predicting Runoff From Rainfall Using Neural Networks. Engineering Hydrology. 760-765.

Tokar, A.S. and Johnson, P.A. 1999. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 4(3): 232-239.

Nor, N. Harun, S. and Kassim, A. 2007. Radial Basis Function Modeling of Hourly Streamflow Hydrograph. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 12(1): 113-123.

Kuok, K.K. Harun, S. and Shamsuddin, S.M. 2010. Particle Swarm Optimization Feedforward Neural Network For Modeling Runoff. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 7(1): 67-78.

Hundecha, Y. Bardossy, A., Werner, H.W. 2001. Development of a fuzzy logic-based rainfall-runoff model. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 46(3): 363-376.

Nayak, P. Sudheer, K. and Ramasastri, K. 2005. Fuzzy Computing Based Rainfall–Runoff Model For Real Time Flood Forecasting. Hydrological Processes. 19(4): 955-968.

Özelkan, E.C. and Duckstein, L. 2001. Fuzzy Conceptual Rainfall–Runoff Models. Journal of Hydrology. 253(1–4): 41-68.

Maskey, S. Guinot, V. and Price, R.K. 2004. Treatment Of Precipitation Uncertainty In Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: A Fuzzy Set Approach. Advances in Water Resources. 27(9): 889-898.

Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets: Information And Control. 8(3): 338-353.

Mamdani, E.H. 1974. Application Of Fuzzy Algorithms For Control Of Simple Dynamic Plant. Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers. 121(12): 1585-1588.

Takagi, T. and Sugeno, M. 1985. Fuzzy Identification Of Systems And Its Applications To Modeling And Control: Systems. Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, SMC. 15(1): 116-132.

Lin, C.T. and Lee, C. 1996. Neural fuzzy systems: a neuro-fuzzy synergism to intelligent systems. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Talei, A., Chua, L.H.C. and Wong, T.S.W. 2010. Evaluation Of Rainfall And Discharge Inputs Used By Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) in rainfall–runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology. 391(3–4): 248-262.

Zounemat-Kermani, M. and Teshnehlab, M. 2008. Using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for hydrological time series prediction. Applied Soft Computing. 8(2): 928-936.

Nayak, P.C. Sudheer, K.P. Rangan, D.M. and Ramasastri, K.S. 2004. A Neuro-Fuzzy Computing Technique For Modeling Hydrological Time Series. Journal of Hydrology. 291(1–2): 52-66.

Nawaz, N. Harun, S. and Talei, A. 2015. Application Of Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) For River Stage Prediction In A Tropical Catchment. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 735(0): 195-199.

Talei, A. Chua, L.H.C. and Quek, C. 2010. A Novel Application Of A Neuro-Fuzzy Computational Technique In Event-Based Rainfall–Runoff Modeling. Expert Systems with Applications. 37(12): 7456-7468.

Nourani, V. and Komasi, M. 2013. A Geomorphology-Based ANFIS Model For Multi-Station Modeling Of Rainfall–Runoff Process. Journal of Hydrology. 490(0): 41-55.

Nasr, A. and Bruen, M. 2008. Development Of Neuro-Fuzzy Models To Account For Temporal And Spatial Variations In A Lumped Rainfall–Runoff Model. Journal of Hydrology. 349(3–4): 277-290.

Vernieuwe, H. Georgieva, O, De Baets, B. Pauwels, V. R. Verhoest, N. E. and De Troch, F. P. 2005. Comparison Of Data-Driven Takagi–Sugeno Models Of Rainfall–Discharge Dynamics. Journal of Hydrology. 302(1–4): 173-186.

Hong, Y.S.T. and White, P.A. 2009. Hydrological Modeling Using A Dynamic Neuro-Fuzzy System With On-Line And Local Learning Algorithm. Advances in Water Resources. 32(1): 110-119.

Jang, J.S.R. 1993. ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System. Systems. Man and Cybernetics: IEEE Transactions on. 23(3): 665-685.

Van Ooyen, A. and Nienhuis, B. 1992. Improving The Convergence Of The Back-Propagation Algorithm. Neural Networks. 5(3): 465-471.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9693

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2012 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.